Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
John Profic wrote:
Sorry, for confusion, but I mean book titled i386/x64_64 not standalone x86_64 (which I notice is *broken* :))
You mean this one?
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/cross-lfs/x86/

If so, the title for that one is 'Intel/AMD x86' and it's assumed that you're building 32-bit everything.
O-o-ops. Seems I need better eyes :). I had read this a lot, but thought it was 'Intel x86/AMD x86_64'. Thus I desided this part of book is for single-lib build no matter 32- or 64-bit.

Scripts are good, but they are evil :), as I want *understand* what I do first, and later automate it. It's not so easily with them, as they contain a lot of stuff for other archs.
I understand. ;) Unfortunately, I'm not sure if LFS has any plans yet to support 64-bit archs that build *just* 64-bit. As you've noticed, gcc likes to assume lib64 if it's building 64-bit and causes all sorts of headaches.
However, till enter-chroot fase this is *only* problem.
I'll continue to build and see if it is really the only problem.

Moreover when I'll build multi-lib system, I try to follow lsb proposal for multi-arch builds [1], concrete: Option B, as seems lfs do not use package manager and Option C is impractical.
[1] http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/
--
Best regards,
John 'Profic' Ustiuzhanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Smart Media Group, MK-Kursk, Kursk, Russia
Using
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
ALT Linux Master 2.0 (server.smg 2.4.20-alt0.1-adv-up)


--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to