El Miércoles, 25 de Mayo de 2005 01:11, Jim Gifford escribió: > M.Canales.es wrote:
> >.- To add all possible XInclude tags to avoid duplicated text before to > > start updating the arch-specific text redaction. I will use the next > > rules: > > I tried to do that were possible, ran into some issue we can talk about > those. Well, in some cases to find the proper xpointer path could be hard. And we are yet moving/copying files to the archs directories, breaking the existent xpointers. > I'm not sure how we are going to approach the SBUs issue. I personally > think they should be eliminated I was thinking also on that. Now we can't use the cross-binutils build time as SBU unit due the possibily that this package will be compiled on a different machine than the fiinal system. Then, how to meassure SBUs for final system packages? But to full remove SBUs we need also the BLFS editors agreement. > I tried to merge all the changes as Matt has done them, so you may want > to check them before you change them. I'm aware that several typo fixes has been already ported. But I want to be sure that no one is missed before to merge this branch to trunk ;-) Like in BLFS, I will do the commits file-by-file to try to avoid conflicts. But in this case to follow an alphabetical order isn't usefull due that we need to have ready first the master files to can adjust the xpointer paths. Then, I will start on the final-system/ directory following build order. Then the other directories in book order. Inside each top-level directory (incuding the final-system/ one), the order will be: common, x86, multilib, ppc, raq2, sparc, sparc64, x86_64. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
