M.Canales.es wrote:
El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 21:42, Jim Gifford escribió:
SBU's are going to be invalid up to chapter 9, chapter 9 will be the
first chapter that we could provide SBU information.
I agree.
That meant that SBUs could be removed in other chapters, true?
My plan for packages.ent was something simliar to what archaic was
suggesting
<!-- Package 1 -->
<!ENTITY package-version "2.59">
<!ENTITY package-size "2.3 MB">
<!ENTITY package-url "http://url/to/package/official/download";
<!ENTITY package-buildsize "81 MB">
<!ENTITY package-time "0.3 SBU">
The one thing I'm not sure on is if the SBU's will be the same on the
different architectures,
I we can to use the same SBU and build size on al archs that would be great.
IMHO a desviation < 5 % (or maybe 10%) could be acceptable for both, SBUs and
build sizes.
Sounds good to me, but I will defer to Matt to say if it's ok.
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
