On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:20:46 -0700, GN wrote: > On Wednesday 06 July 2005 23:18, Archaic wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:03:05AM +0200, Feldmeier Bernd wrote: >> > This would be a good step for final 6.1 >> >> No it would be a terrible step. One week isn't possibly long enough to >> test such drastic changes. We are trying to produce a "stable" book and >> while those updates you mentioned may produce a stable system, we cannot >> know that it just a week's time. > [...] > I agree with the assesment on the time issue. Nevertheless, I've been > using the 2.6.12.2 kernel with no problems. It is worth trying it. > > --SeattleGaucho
And then when 2.6.12.3 comes out someone will want that added to the book. If the users want the latest kernel and libc-threads, they can do that on their own. We don't need to go around and pull stuff from cvs and testing into the stable book. William -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
