Matthew Burgess wrote:
Having said that, does anyone know for definite whether anything in LFS requires flex anymore, now that we're using FSF binutils again? Playing devil's advocate here, maybe we could kick this package over the fence to BLFS and let you guys deal with the pain it causes? :)
I was pretty sure that Jim had checked this and found that indeed with FSF Binutils nothing in LFS uses flex. But he should comment on that himself...
-- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
