Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had assumed 1. But you all are correct, it is better to mark it > so. Will do that.
Thank you. :-) As a followup, not all patches need a license notice. Insignificant changes are not copyrightable, so the patches that simply change a few symbols or inhibit the building of a utility in a package need no license. This is the opinion of the FSF, which I think is worth listening to, since they have consulted lawyers. You can refer to <http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Legally-Significant>. The safe thing is of course to say that all patches should carry a license notice, so my original proposition still stands. -- Henrik S. Hansen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
