On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:15 +0200, Jens Olav Nygaard wrote: > Since the subject became increasingly inaccurate, and since my > rate of hickups to installed packages indicates that this will > not be my last question, I swap in another thread... > > Now reading the book more carefully, I notice that the toolchain > adjustment says that ld-linux.so.2 should be replaced by the new > platform's dynamic linker, in an "Important-box". > > I have /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 replaced by /tools/lib64..., > but should /lib/ld-linux.so.2 be replaced by /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 > or by /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2? (Note that > /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 does not exist, but I *do* want to end up > with a combined 32/64-bit system...) > > J.O.
You may want to consider using the cross-lfs book ( in development ) or the cross-lfs scripts (from svn) if attempting a bi-arch x86_64 build from a 32bit OS. The book is (IIRC) under http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork , the scripts are in svn.linuxfromscratch.org ( cross-lfs ) Should buy you some clues ;-) Best Regards [R] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
