Greg Schafer wrote: > But seriously, seeing as GCC-4.x appears OK, > maybe it doesn't matter much that the wrong sysctl name is used. But > reading the comments in the patch, it does worry me a bit :-( Feel free > to take a stab at enhancing the patch then attach it to 14400 in the GCC > bugzilla for review. > > Regards > Greg > -- > http://www.diy-linux.org/ >
TY, even if LFS doesn't use it, it'll probably be needed in BLFS at some point. Will dig in and play after BLFS-6.1 release. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
