Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 07/30/05 11:41 CST: > Is this patch required? > > If not, perhaps it should be removed from the list of patches.
Looking at the ChangeLog it appears this patch is no longer used, so I've attached a patch to fix the branch sources. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 12:15:01 up 119 days, 11:48, 2 users, load average: 1.41, 1.10, 0.70
Index: chapter03/patches.xml =================================================================== --- chapter03/patches.xml (revision 6602) +++ chapter03/patches.xml (working copy) @@ -60,13 +60,6 @@ </varlistentry> <varlistentry> -<term>GCC No-Fixincludes Patch - 1 KB:</term> -<listitem> -<para><ulink url="&patches-root;&gcc-no_fixincludes-patch;"/></para> -</listitem> -</varlistentry> - -<varlistentry> <term>GCC Specs Patch - 14 KB:</term> <listitem> <para><ulink url="&patches-root;&gcc-specs-patch;"/></para> Index: patches.ent =================================================================== --- patches.ent (revision 6602) +++ patches.ent (working copy) @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ <!ENTITY flex-fixes-patch "flex-&flex-version;-debian_fixes-3.patch"> -<!ENTITY gcc-no_fixincludes-patch "gcc-&gcc-version;-no_fixincludes-1.patch"> <!ENTITY gcc-specs-patch "gcc-&gcc-version;-specs-1.patch"> <!ENTITY glibc-testfix-patch "glibc-&glibc-version;-fix_test-1.patch">
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
