Randy McMurchy wrote:
Yet you give a -1 for the simple addition of a single little old library (and its dictionary) to LFS. Please provide something concrete, else I'll think you are just disagreeing for the fun of it. :-)
Randy, that's hardly fair. Several times in this thread people *have* offered you reasons and you come back and say they aren't valid, simply because they're not exactly what you want to hear. You ask for simple opinions, yes or no, but refuse to allow a person *to* say no. If you can't let those opinions stand, but continue to feel a need to win over *every single person* who comments, there's really not much point in continuing this thread.
-- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
