El Lunes, 8 de Agosto de 2005 08:42, Archaic escribió: > Hrmm. Well if it is deemed to be more accurate using screen tags as > opposed to just para tags, that is easily fixed, but since we aren't > actually typing in the command as seen, but rather inserting it into > another command, I don't know if screen would be semantically correct, > either. I'll let Manuel or Matt decide.
The use of [screen] is fine for both look consistency and to prevent unwanted line wrapping, not only on PDF output, but also in browsers with a window size smaller than the actual command. About the child tag, [literal] is semantically correct due that the sed script must be typed literally, but isn't a command on their own, then [userinput] don't fit well here. Plus, using [literal] the font size used will be "normal" instead of "bold", making most notable that is an optional step. Committing that small fix now. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
