On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 05:35:54PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > Again, as I see things, if we want to be using gcc4 we should be doing > it correctly and using the code that is meant for it, ie, glibc
True enough, but snapshots suck. Before doing that, I would vote for taking gcc-4 out of trunk so we can continue with gcc-3.4.x and glibc-2.3.x as it is much closer to stable. I really hope this doesn't turn into another 6 month (or longer) book release cycle. :/ -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
