On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had fully intended to leave LFS ... I wasn't able to keep myself away. Sounds like an addiction. >Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs Since we talked last, I improved my diy-linux scripts to do what I mentioned. Now they're now more closely integrated with the package data, so you don't have to list specific tarball numbers; in most cases, only the scriptlet name. And with the new restart checkpoints, it's easy to restart after a failure. Also, I changed the name to cblx for "custom built linux" so the name is project neutral. >one of the team members here ... suggested that I created this notion of >leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the comment >that I 'need help'. With a little extra development effort, I could adapt cblx to work with lfs too. But since diy-linux provides what I need, I have little incentive to undertake that extra work. Well I see some other posts here with similar offers. So many ideas, so little time ... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
