Randy McMurchy wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 12/28/05 18:28 CST:
The subject says it all:) I would like to propose mentioning optional
dependencies for packages that are installed in LFS. Since most of the
packages are never mentioned in BLFS, the dependencies never get
mentioned.
Good idea. There is precedent as well. Just recently, the CrackLib
package was listed as something optional to install before the
Shadow package to provide extended capability for Shadow.
I like it. +1
Justin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
