Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/17/06 18:22 CST: > FWIW, I believe all of the project leads have said that they'd like to > use Trac. Also, the implementation of it won't be done overnight, so we > should be able to hit a panic button if we need to.
I don't think anyone has argued that set up effectively, and used for the right purposes that Trac cannot benefit the community. However, my concern is your overzealous push to put *everything* on Trac. At least that has been my observation. I could have misinterpreted your intentions, however, so take what I said with a grain of salt. But every time somebody has made an argument to use something other than Trac for any of the purposes you initially suggested its use for (even the website), you've been quick to refute the argument, and to me with less than compelling and/or even a similar argument. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:27:00 up 115 days, 3:51, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.52, 0.71 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
