Ag Hatzim wrote:
But if we end up like this,soon or later there will one book for every
developer :).
Isn't it what already happened without my help? But you are probably
right :)
Now,and regarding Chris (possible valid) concerns,can you tell us exactly how
extra space will take a UTF-8 enabled book,and the extra amount of memory
Ncurses
will need?
Have you that info please?
On-disk size with "-Os -s" in CFLAGS:
"fold" without UTF-8 support: 13292 bytes
"fold" with UTF-8 support: 15260 bytes
libncurses.so.5.5: 239967 bytes
libncursesw.so.5.5: 272455 bytes
Runtime:
Process 22795 is alsamixer linked against ncurses, 25307 is alsamixer
linked against ncursesw.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
22795 patrakov 18 0 4984 1492 1140 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.02 alsamixer
25307 patrakov 18 0 5144 1632 1164 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.02 alsamixer
with alsamixer, all the size difference is due to libncursesw itself. A
"skewed" test would be Mutt, because, unlike alsamixer, it checks for
extra features provided by ncursesw and adds its own extra code if
ncursesw is found.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
