Randy McMurchy wrote: > Should we not wait until there is *some* sort of explanation by > somebody about Greg's points? Jeremy, since you've taken it upon > yourself to take lead in this, could you address some of Greg's > points, please?
Ryan did that already. Or haven't you read what he said? Personally, like most everyone else around here, I can't judge which method is technically better. Perhaps some third party that has done both methods and an analysis on each can report back with results. What is *currently* in trunk is an untested (but hopefully working) build. All I'm going to be putting in is a *known* method and what we have been using; what should have been there since September. Surely, you can appreciate that. If, later, we find more compelling reasons to switch to -B, we can. > Are we in some sort of hurry to make commits? Especially to something > as critical as toolchain packages. I *have* waited for three days on this. We've gotten nowhere. Putting our original method back for now gives us what we had before. To leave it as it is now would mean there is an unknown entity concerning the toolchain in trunk. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
