Dan Nicholson wrote: > My fault, I missed the > in the xml. It works as you say, even > running it repeatedly. It would make sense to drop the -i anyway, > though. We're not actually supplying perl with a file for the -i.
Yep, agreed. I think the -i is a leftover from stable where we *are* editing a file in place. Probably the same for that flashing red note in Cross-LFS about not running the command more than once. I think that's bogus because you always get a new specs file. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
