stephan sperber wrote:
i dont really know if thats the same issue, but here is a link from lkml http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/31/22 in this link is mentioned (if my poor english gets it right) that udev -- daemon isnt needed.
They say "udevstart is not needed", not "udevd --daemon is not needed".
-- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
