Archaic wrote these words on 02/08/06 16:42 CST: > Leave it as is. Any change requires a new date. Only technical > changes require a changelog entry. It's been done this way at least > since the lfs-editor manual has been around and it seems overly > reactionary to change it due to one report of confusion.
Well, make that two reports. I occasionally fall for that one as well. Even over on the BLFS side, I'll see the date of the book updated, yet no entry in the changelog and am confused. What was changed, then? (you say to yourself) I'm guilty of that as well, and try not to do it for the very reasons already stated. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 16:42:00 up 137 days, 2:06, 3 users, load average: 0.19, 0.10, 0.21 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
