On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > This is correct; branch_point_5_1 is a tag, not a branch, that > represents the "tip" of the b5_1 branch. It was made just after Matthew > finished his newxml merge into HEAD, and before any of today's changes > (or even the 5.1-pre2 version entity change). What you are seeing is > expected.
I don't see how it could be, because the other two have files and revisions they should not have had in them. So, which parameter should I pass to keep an updated tree of 5.1-pre2, then? b5_1, v5_1-pre2, or branch_point_5_1? Still confused.... -- Archaic Government should be weak, amateurish and ridiculous. At present, it fulfills only a third of the role. - Edward Abbey -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
