On 3/3/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan, you're asking questions that unless you did these tests yourself, > you don't fully understand (or know) what all is being lost when you > say "not as good of test coverage". I know I don't fully understand > what is being lost. If this makes me unqualified to answer the question, > then say so.
Nothing is being lost relative to the current build. The autoconf tests in both situations would be improved (I don't know to what extent because I haven't looked) if libtool and automake were available. This is not fixing a regression since this has never been the situation. So, we're trying to address the situation of "How do we improve the autoconf test suite without regressing the build?" That's where I came up with the suggestions for what to do. So far, the votes are: Me: Move up libtool and grep, note about missing automake Chris: Same Jeremy: Add note about missing automake and libtool -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
