Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Son, 2006-03-19 at 12:28 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
I'm using with the compat headers (modified from Jurg's version of the
script) and glibc-2.3.6. Did not use Jurg's patch, well I did, but came
across the same types of errors. After adding <net/if.h> to ipaddress.c
and ifstat.c, here is the remaining error.
/usr/include/linux/socket.h:2:2: warning: #warning "You should include
<sys/socket.h>. This time I will do it for you. "
ipaddress.c: In function 'print_link_flags':
ipaddress.c:96: error: 'IFF_DYNAMIC' undeclared (first use in this function)
ipaddress.c:96: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ipaddress.c:96: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [ipaddress.o] Error 1
IFF_DYNAMIC is not in /usr/include/net/if.h.
Well, glibc 2.3.6 is too old, then. The sanitized headers my script
generate are not just generic sanitized kernel headers, they are
specific to glibc and as we've just found out, it only works with 2.4
even.
Well, specific to what paldo uses, but the package base is large enough
to catch most, if not all, of what LFS will use too. For this
particular situation, I think it's still best (LFS Specific) to wrap it
in an ifdef rather than pull in something from kernel that glibc doesn't
know about.
Next error was in sysklogd:
gcc -O3 -DSYSV -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fno-strength-reduce -DFSSTND
-c ksym_mod.cIn file included from ksym_mod.c:97:
module.h:31:24: error: asm/atomic.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [ksym_mod.o] Error 1
I didn't look at the code, a simple "sed -i /atomic.h/d module.h"
'fixed' the compilation problem. Need to double check why it thinks it
needs atomic.h.
That's funny; the kernel headers patch I use in paldo is the one you
submitted in 2003 to lfs (origin LSB), and this version works just fine
as it doesn't contain a atomic.h reference :)
Well, LFS chose to use the debian patch. But I believe that include is
not needed anymore. According to the comments in ksym_mod.c, it was
added Jan 10, 1998 to overcome a problem with linux-2.1.18. :-) This
was brought up in this thread previously and discussed by Jim, Andy, and
Alexander IIRC. Will reply in that part of the thread for the archives.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
