Jim Gifford wrote: > On a few of the lists I have seen this done with success > and found out that this is the recommended build method for GLIBC, still > checking on the status GCC and this situation.
It has *always* been an option to compile Glibc against raw headers. Nothing there has changed. LFS did exactly that not too long ago. But IMHO "recommended" is debatable. Doing some analysis shows Glibc doesn't want much from the kernel headers. So as far as Glibc compilation is concerned, raw vs sanitized is much of a muchness. As for GCC, it's a userspace application. Compiling it against raw is definitely wrong. It'll more than likely compile, but in principle it is technically incorrect IMHO. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
