Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > So. For some reason which I haven't spotted yet, binutils in pass2 isn't > creating the binary ld-new, but a bash script, which says in its header: > > # ld-new - temporary wrapper script for .libs/ld-new > # Generated by ltmain.sh - GNU libtool 1.4a-GCC3.0 (1.641.2.256 > 2001/05/28 20:09:07 with GCC-local changes) > # > # The ld-new program cannot be directly executed until all the libtool > # libraries that it depends on are installed. > # > # This wrapper script should never be moved out of the build directory. > # If it is, it will not operate correctly.
Ah, the joys of libtool... ;-) If you want a dynamically-linked ld (probably not required), and you want to copy it out of the source directory, then you're going to need to change the: cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin line to be: cp -v ld/.libs/ld-new /tools/bin instead. (At least I'm fairly sure the directory's name is .libs) That file should be an actual binary, not a wrapper script built by libtool. (The wrapper script is built so that ld-new can be run from the current directory, for tests and stuff like that. libtool --mode=install will grab the binary out of the .libs/ subdirectory and copy that to the target directory, instead of copying the wrapper script.) I'm not sure which method is better, actually (static ld versus copying out of the .libs/ subdirectory). But the latter should be possible.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
