On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:48:29PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote: > > I disagree - all such dependencies should be listed regardless of > whether they are accounted for by alphabetical order.
It's starting to sound like you want to duplicate the info in the individual package pages. I don't agree with that. Oddities like circular deps and binary path hardcoding are things that the individual package pages don't support and would be very welcome here. The other info is just duplicate. If I'm missing the point, feel free to enlighten me. :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
