Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Second, I'm not so sure that gcc-2.95.3 is valid anymore. Certainly it isn't valid for the kernel; it might be less confusing to just require gcc-3.x (or greater) for the entire system.
My initial intent when opening the bug was to react to DIY statement that they can bootstrap from a certain old distro, without mentioning what's actually required. So, mentioning the exact requirements is essential for becoming better than DIY in this aspect (even if the actual bootstrappability is worse).
-- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
