M.Canales.es wrote:
> What I can't undestart is that the book SBU values are smallest that
> mine :-?

Have the SBU numbers been updated at all since 6.1 or 6.1.1?  If not,
those book versions still use gcc 3.4.  If gcc 4's bootstrap takes a lot
longer than gcc 3.4's did, then that could explain the higher SBUs when
building gcc 4.

Of course this won't affect other packages unless gcc 4 also compiles
slower and binutils was built with gcc 3.

(There was another issue with SBUs way back when the book first moved to
gcc 3.  IIRC gcc 2 compiled stuff faster than gcc 3, so a gcc2 distro
built the static bash (or binutils, whichever it was) faster than a gcc3
distro did.  And since chapter 6 used gcc 3, the SBU numbers got skewed
when the user used one the "wrong" host compiler.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to