Archaic wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:01:28PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:OK, here's a second go at it:Looks good. I see one thing, though: "The most likely reason is that something went wrong with the specs file amendment above." s/above// because it isn't relevant on the gcc page.
Thanks. I'll fix that shortly. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
