El Sábado, 27 de Mayo de 2006 06:18, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió: > 1) The translation must be done with the same DocBook XML tools as the > English book, and a link to the DocBook source must be provided > > 2) The translation should be compatible with jhalfs, and the non-obvious > differences in produced Makefiles, if any, should be explained in XML > comments, in English, so that the original LFS editors can read them.
Actually, running jhalfs on both the original book and the translated book and diffing the output is the best way to be sure that the commands and packages/patches versions in both books are identical. And that implies that the sources of translated books must be in the same format and layout than the original book. > 3) The comments in example files (such as /etc/fstab) must not be > translated Saying that all translations whose jhalfs output differs from the official output (except for TIMEZONE and LANG environment settings, that can differs also from one user to another running jhalfs on the official book) will be rejected should to cover that also. > Is this proposal acceptable? Fine by me. I will adapt the Spanish SVN translation to that policies in the next update. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
