Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
Vim Mandir Adjusts location of man pages to meet man-db's
expectations Not submitted, N/A LFS-specific, apparently. I
think the first hunk should go upstream, as it fixes non-compliance with
the FHS. Other than that, maybe we can drop this if/when LFS uses `man'
rather than `man-db' again.
This is not LFS-specific. No known version of any Man-like program
searches in the /usr/share/man/ru.KOI8-R directory.
Alexander, do you have time to submit this upstream and track its
progress? The header says that it "Adjusts installation of manual pages
to meet Man-DB expectations.". I assume it mentions "Man-DB"
specficially, simply because that's our implementation of `man' at the
moment, but in fact, the paths need to be changed for any/all known
implementations of `man' as per your comments at the end of
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-August/057918.html?
Thanks,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
