El Miércoles, 13 de Septiembre de 2006 18:11, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió: > I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without > me.
I hope that at least you continue sending posts and comments. Your contributions are very appreciated. > > This also means that LFS should drop (too kludgy and half-working) UTF-8 > support. This decision is also backed by the fact that some BLFS editors > repeatedly, but certainly not deliberately, misinterpreted my writings. > Beware, however, that there are applications (e.g. shadow and > nautilus-cd-burner) that expect RedHat-like UTF-8 setup (shadow is > already fixed in the book, nautilus-cd-burner is unfixable). IMHO, a not-full-working UTF-8 support is better than no support at all. Keeping it in the book can allow folks to catch the bugs and try to fix it, ot report it to better document the issues. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
