Robert Connolly wrote:
I'm sorry to say I'm much better being an hlfs-unstable maintainer than hlfs-stable maintainer. I'd love to have hlfs-stable, but I never stop finding things to break/fix :-) If releasing hlfs-stable is a priority then it would be a good idea to create a second branch which removes the half-working stuff and stabilizes the rest. I honestly don't see an end to the instability without a second maintainer :-\
I have interest in a production-capable -stable branch, and time to donate. What I have less of is skill, but I'd like to change that :)
I'd be happy to do grunt work under the direction of someone more experienced, to further this end. I've built HLFS (and played around with a lot of homegrown variations) many times now, and followed the list for a year or so.
Let me know how I can help, -jps -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
