Matthew Burgess wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
More on-topic for this list, x86 now has two reports of successful
builds. Maybe LFS should reclaim its 'bleeding edge' position and
switch to the 2.6.18 headers as soon as the new kernel is out, then
let people here and in BLFS find out if anything is broken in use ?
That's the approach I was going to propose too. Unless folks really
start (ab)using this new header_install target, upstream (both kernel
and userspace packages) are going to remain broken. Let's help these
guys out. After all, it'll make our lives easier in the future by not
requiring any patches at all :-)
Regards,
Matt.
Matt,
David will not listen to this, I have tried. His words are, it's not
userspace submit patches to the actual program maintainer.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
