Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Joe Ciccone wrote: > >> What kind of incompatibilities are we talking about? udev? >> > > IIRC, yes -- I think we started doing that when some kernel changed the > layout of /sys. More recently, there's a kernel version floating around > somewhere that uses /sys/class/block instead of /sys/block for block > devices; that may break the udev script. I think it would make more sense to say udev bootscript and a reason, like the one mentioned above, instead of the bootscripts in general. The comment is open to a lot of interpretation.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
