On 11/3/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. We should be using the version numbers from packages.ent, rather than a hard-coded value. Unfortunately they were structured in such a way as to make using them in this context awkward. I've rejigged things a bit and committed a fix in r7852. I thought it was safe to remove the warnings about incompatibilities with the bootscripts as I think this was really to do with the udev related issues with 2.6.18. If anyone thinks the warning is still relevant, give me a shout and I'll put it back in.
Bryan or Alexander would know best, but I would expect this issue to creep up until the udev/kernel interface is totally solid. Part of the problem is the stuff in 05-early.rules which are really just workarounds for the kernel. I don't know if those are always backwards compatible. Hopefully this post hasn't been to FUD laden. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
