On 12/4/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Laire wrote:
>> > 3) Grant of Source Code License. The term "Source Code" means the
>> > preferred form of the Original Work for making modifications to it
>> > and all available documentation describing how to modify the
>> > Original Work.
Since I put the AFL in the book, this was my reasoning: Someone
distributing the code does not have to *distribute* the documentation.
They have to *make it available*. In my mind, a link to the BLFS book
is sufficient for that.
If "all available documentation ..." is interpreted widely enough, that
could mean any documentation describing how to modify XML-files
(since the source is in XML).
So the distributor would need to link to all available documents which
describes how to modify XML-files. IMHO that's quite a stupid
requirement as it's practically impossible to fulfill, since there are
quite many such documents available in internet.
--
Markus Laire
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
