Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 01/17/07 01:37 CST: > >> Just a reminder to open ticket...I'll get to it tomorrow. >> >> Link for GPM is dead >> > Resolving arcana.linux.it... 151.38.134.203 > Hmm, strange. It works fine now. Nothing arcana was resolving last night for me around 11:30ish CST...might have been a little earlier, but the link that Dan posted is where I grabbed it from. >> and we never create /etc/pam.d directory in >> shadow's instructions, >> > Instead of in the Shadow instructions, it should be in the Linux-PAM > instructions. We only install Shadow in BLFS because Linux-PAM is > installed, then a *reinstallation* of Shadow. And because Linux-PAM > instructions show to create /etc/pam.d/other, the creation of the > directory should be in Linux-PAM instructions *not* Shadow's. > Actually, those shown on the Linux-PAM page are shown only as an example. There is no instruction to actually use the example, though there was at one time. The first set of user input instructions is the block that creates /etc/pam.d/login. One of the two pages needs to be modified. I'll bug it in a second and get it fixed as soon as I have the tools installed. Now, the opinionated question? Keep all the pam.d files on the Shadow page, or modify the text surrounding the first 'other' file so that it's not an example and show only the /etc/pam.conf file as an alternate example?
-- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
