On 1/19/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/19/07 14:01 CST: > > > Sorry. These guys have security fixes, so I'd prefer they go in. The > > updates are totally straightforward. But I'll understand if we've > > frozen and you want to push to 6.2.1. > > > > Regardless of what happens with this one, I'll be sure to discuss > > things on -dev before just going ahead. > > I would like the Firefox and Thunderbird updates to go in as well. > > My whole point in (what may be considered) the hassle of discussing, > is that by throwing it out on the list, we may get a head start > on some issue from someone chiming in with "Oh yeah, BTW, I noticed > that x...y...z in this version. Look out for it".
Right, I totally understand. I had marked these for update in my mind's internal bugzilla a while back and forgot that they weren't in a real bug system. :) Bruce's SeaMonkey ticket prompted me to action. Won't forget next time. Speaking of next time... I'd like to update the tbird enigmail to 0.94.2. There's a bugfix that was important enough to have a CVE assigned to it (2006-5877). The relevant bug is here: http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730 What says the group? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
