DJ Lucas wrote: > I'll bug the maintainer and let him > know about the issue Well..he's aware, but after reading the post, which I didn't completely understand, it still seems to be a Pyrex problem and not the pyx file. http://lists.copyleft.no/pipermail/pyrex/2007-January/002147.html The post before that one (enum regression 0.9.5?) has a 'fix' that's not exactly a fix IIUC. Anyway, for BLFS we should force 0.9.4.1 unless 0.9.6 is released soon, which it looks like it will be. http://lists.copyleft.no/pipermail/pyrex/2007-January/002142.html
If somebody else wants to force that, go ahead, but with a pending release 'in the next couple of days', I'd say we leave it alone for a few days. I've created ticket #2228 so it's not forgotten. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
