On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:34, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 2/14/07, Arden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > also glibc-2.5 wants to replace the linux-header file > > /usr/include/scsi/sg.h with it's own. > > Should we be addressing this?
Yes. > I noticed that in Fedora they remove the > scsi directory from the generated headers. DIY is doing something > similar. > > http://www.diy-linux.org/x86-reference-build/chroot.html#c-linux-kernel-hea >ders Well, one has to ask why the Glibc headers are preferred over the kernel ones. Also, does anyone know whether this has been reported to the upstream kernel folks? Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
