Dan Nicholson wrote: > 1. We shouldn't always point to the svn version. When a stable book is > released, it should probably point to the stable version of the BLFS > book. Although, there could be a time lapse where this could be a bad > idea, i.e. LFS-6.2 + BLFS-6.1. Still, if someone's following the > stable LFS book, they probably don't want to get forwarded into the > development version of BLFS.
They may think they don't, but they probably do. The -dev version of the book is appropriate until the corresponding version of blfs is released. In the last cycle, that took quite a long time. As a rule of thumb, when using lfs-x.y, use blfs-dev until blfs-x.y is released. Currently, there is no way to go back and change released books. The only alternative is to use the errata page. One way I can think of is to point to a pseudo blfs on the web site and use appropriate symbolic links to the right pages. Initially they would point to -dev and then would be changed to point to the appropriate version ov blfs when that is released. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
