On 4/11/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a series of patches that hopefully resolves all the issues > below. The functions seem to work fine in my testing. I'll describe > them a bit below.
No one's said anything, so I'm committing these patches. I'm also going to roll a new bootscripts tarball some time soon. One other idea I had. What about adding a "-s" argument to statusproc so that it won't return any output? This is in line with the other *proc functions that silence they're output. This would allow me to not redirect output for this: statusproc process && do something that would bomb without the running process -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
