Justin R. Knierim wrote: > Robert Connolly wrote: >> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load, >> servers can't use it. > I haven't had problems with either packages myself, syslog-ng was > perfectly fine on my dedicateds. Actually at work, we have 2000 shared > hosting servers hosting 500,000 domains running debian sarge, all of > them run syslog-ng with no problems at all. Of course there could be > something I don't know about where syslog-ng lacks.
Just to add to this, anduin has been running with syslog-ng from the beginning and it has never had a problem. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
