On 6/12/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/12/07, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:22:58AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > In the current udev rules, we have: > > > > > > KERNEL=="cpu[0-9]*", NAME="cpu/%n/cpu" > > > > > > However, I believe these nodes should be cpu/%n/cpuid. That's what > > > they have in the suse and debian rules: > > > > That's what I get for figuring the kernel-provided name was accurate. > > ;-)
Oh, wow. I just found this upstream version of devices.txt. http://www.lanana.org/docs/device-list/devices-2.6+.txt Someone should go through our rules and see if there are any discrepancies. I notice this: 11 block SCSI CD-ROM devices 0 = /dev/scd0 First SCSI CD-ROM 1 = /dev/scd1 Second SCSI CD-ROM ... The prefix /dev/sr (instead of /dev/scd) has been deprecated. I also noticed that most of my devices in /dev/pts have the tape group instead of tty. Anyone else notice this? $ ls -l /dev/pts total 0 crw--w---- 1 dan tty 136, 0 2007-06-12 11:32 0 crw--w---- 1 dan tape 136, 1 2007-06-12 11:20 1 crw--w---- 1 dan tape 136, 2 2007-06-12 11:32 2 crw--w---- 1 dan tape 136, 3 2007-06-12 09:34 3 crw--w---- 1 dan tape 136, 4 2007-06-12 09:08 4 $ mount | grep devpts devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,mode=0620,gid=4) $ grep -e tape -e tty /etc/group tty:x:4: tape:x:5: -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
