On 8/29/07, Rich Edelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can find my build logs (as a .tar.bz2) at > http://www.quokworld.com/lfs/6.3/lfs-6.3-build-logs.tar.bz2. > Or just browse around http://www.quokworld.com/lfs/6.3/logs/. > > My machine is a dual Xeon 3.2Ghz (hyperthreaded, heh), 2GB of RAM and a couple > 250GB SATA drives. (Dell Precision 470).
Thanks, Rich. I've uploaded (and organized) the logs. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.3/DualXeon-3.2GHz/ http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.3/DualXeon-3.2GHz/00-README Let me know if you want any information added or removed from the README file. Am I correct that you didn't run the testsuites? > I used jhalfs-2.3 and the lfs livecd-x86-r2032 for my build host on this. > Unfortunately the SBU values created don't mean all that much because there > were a couple of packages (gcc and man-db) that failed to build due to > MAKEFLAGS being set to -j5. Setting it down to -j3 allowed GCC to build, but > man-db refused to build unless MAKEFLAGS was empty. Anyway, if wanted, I can > send in that SBU report.. Total SBUs was like 163 or so (without building the > kernel). Yeah, the SBUs are becoming less useful in a multiple processor world. I mainly like them just to know ballpark figures. I.e., the GCC bootstrap takes a long freakin' time compared to most of the other builds. Which reminds me. Manuel, can you add man-db to the MAKEFLAGS blacklist for jhalfs? 2.4.4 fails pretty consistently for me on -j3. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
