Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Jim Gifford wrote: > >> and now your trying to get it in the mainline. To quote yourself your >> not a "hardcore developer", but your trying to influence the direction >> of LFS to meet your needs. >> > > Oh, lol. You're taking Justin's words and applying them to me. Nice! :) > > I'm definitely not worthy of any special recognition, but I will say > that after the many issues encountered with getting the jh branch fully > working, I understand far more about the toolchain than I ever did before. > > Here's another tip for you, (Greg helped me with this as he did with > several other things) if you're building 64-bit only the use of -m64 is > superfluous. > Right you are, The only reason it's left in the CLFS book is because mips defaults to n32, not 64. Plain and simple, Less XML. Plus it doesn't harm anything.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
