Selon Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My position is that we should stay with grup 0.97 and the compatible > version of e2fsprogs until upstream gets the problems worked out. Of > course, not using the most recent packages will require a note in the > book explaining the issue. > Why prefer to use an older e2fsprogs package than use existing grub-0.9.7 inodesize patch to support different inode sizes?
Or you could change default inodesize to remain to 128 during file system creation with -I 128 option. Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
