On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Huntwork > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that the prevailing attitude here is rather anti GRUB2. Mostly > > because development on it seems to focus on items perceived as useless > > and bloat for a boot loader. > > I haven't piped in on this at all, but I'd just like to say that I > really, really want to be pro-grub2. I periodically peruse the > grub-devel archives hoping to see that a 2.0 release is imminent. I > find it ridiculous that there's no currently supported grub. But, > anyway, I'm still x86 all the time, so grub-0.9.7 is good enough for > me. I'll be curious how this plays out, though.
Well, I have done this before with PowerPC and so I hope that it will be a case of "nothing new to see here" and everything just works. Dennis -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
