Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/12/08 09:28 CST: > I suppose, at some point, we might want to be able to do multilib. But, > at least when I started the branch, it was felt that we'd be better off > just approaching a 64-bit only build. Whenever we do feel like adding > multilib, build notes from various sources would be helpful, I'm sure.
I agree totally that trying to introduce multilib into LFS would be very difficult for us right now. I wasn't trying to say we should. In fact, I probably shouldn't have commented to the thread at all. But I wasn't sure if the OP was talking Pure-64. And now that I think about it some, multilib isn't that difficult for LFS, it is BLFS where it becomes a total PITA (time-consuming). -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 09:32:01 up 85 days, 20 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
